Jewell

Steadfast

Information Memorandum – an Australian-first separation intelligence system

A man sits alone at a kitchen table late at night, head in one hand, a phone lying face up beside a mug.
The hour the product is built for.Concept image
Engagement Steadfast – Separation Support AI (working title)
Status v01 draft – commercial terms not yet settled
Audience Prospective investors and strategic partners, by invitation
Date 2 September 2026
Prepared by Jewell

Confidential

Provided on a confidential basis solely so the recipient can evaluate a potential investment. Not an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security, and not a disclosure document, product disclosure statement or prospectus under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Nothing here is financial product advice. Forward-looking statements carry risk and may not eventuate.

Figures shown as to confirm are unsettled and must not be relied on.

Steadfast and Jewell are not law firms and do not provide legal advice. The full Important Notice sets out what Steadfast is, what it is not, and what remains unproven. It is part of this document.

01Purpose and status

What Steadfast is, what has been built and verified, and what is still open. Issued in draft because the commercial terms are not set.

Sections 03–10
Evidence. Every claim traceable to the codebase, a migration, a test, or a dated live run.
Sections 11–18
Position. The argument is settled; the arithmetic is not. to confirm means the founder has not yet supplied the number.
Section 19
The to-do list. Every unsettled item in one place. Close it and this becomes a final memorandum.

02Executive summary

A private, persistent companion for Australian men in the first year after a separation. Not a chatbot – a system of record: it remembers, keeps facts apart from allegations, watches for risk, keeps a chronology, and always knows the one next move that matters.

7 Build phases complete, repository to hardening
17/17 Tables with row-level security, re-verified 2 Sept 2026
274 Automated tests passing, plus 30 pressure scenarios
None Prompt or reply payloads retained by the gateway, by configuration
  1. The market is underserved by design. Separated men do not present, do not ask and do not talk.
  2. The product is a system of record, not a conversation. Value compounds with use; a generic assistant starts from zero every session.
  3. Privacy is the architecture. No privileged data path, Sydney storage, on-device speech, a gateway that retains nothing. In this category that is the product.
  4. It is built and verified, not specified. All seven phases exercised end to end against a deployed environment with real model calls.
  5. It makes professionals more effective than it competes with them. That is the distribution channel and the credibility test at once.
  6. The commercial case is the open work. Section 19 says exactly what is missing.

Can a newly separated bloke spend ten minutes with this and leave calmer, clearer about his situation, and knowing what he should do next?

The primary success test, from the product principles

The ask. to confirm – amount at to confirm – stage and structure. Use of funds at section 17.

03The problem

Close view over a man’s shoulder as he types a message on his phone at a dark kitchen bench.
The most expensive thirty seconds of the first year. Everything the product does about communication sits between this moment and the send button.Concept image

Everything arrives at once, at the worst possible moment for clear thinking – and much of the damage in the first year is, in the founder’s view, avoidable.

Founder observation. The characterisation of the first year, and of why existing options fall short, reflects experience and belief rather than published research. Section 11 sets out what would have to be measured to establish it.

Why every existing option fails this person

Government and legal information
Accurate, free, general. Does not know his situation. Remembers nothing.
A family lawyer
The right answer eventually, and expensive early. Billable time spent assembling a chronology he could have brought is the most avoidable cost in the process.
Counselling and support lines
Essential, and a different job. They hold the emotional load; they do not organise the case or stop the message.
A general AI assistant
Fluent, agreeable, structurally unsuited. Forgets him, treats an allegation and a fact as the same kind of sentence, agrees with any framing, and has no duty to notice danger.
Mates and family
Loyal, partisan, and often the worst tactical advice he will get. Nobody is available at 11pm.

04The product

A father crouches at an open car door on a suburban street in early morning light, buckling a child into a booster seat.
What the product is protecting: this arrangement, steady, on time, out of the dispute.Concept image

One private companion that turns an unstructured account into an organised, current, defensible picture – then names the one thing worth doing next. Chaos → clarity → priority → action → continuity.

Five tests, five surfaces
The user’s test The surface What it does
It understands me Talk One or two natural questions at a time. Never an intake form.
It remembers me What I know about you Typed memories he can correct or delete.
It makes sense of it The Separation Map Seven dimensions, four levels, unknown by default.
It stops me making it worse Don’t Send This Yet Risks named, and a rewrite he can actually use.
It tells me what to do next Next Move One action, with the reason – superseded, never overwritten.

The Separation Map, live

A fictional case five days in. Open a dimension to see what the system is actually holding. Nothing below belongs to a real person.

Children Urgent

Two, aged 6 and 9. No written arrangement. Seen twice in eleven days, both brief and unplanned. Nothing recorded on schooling or health.

Drives the current Next Move: propose a written week-to-week arrangement in writing, calmly, before a pattern sets by default.

Communication Urgent

Escalating. Four messages in two days flagged for tone, one draft intercepted before sending. All contact by text.

Legal Needs attention

No lawyer, no proceedings. He reports a letter arrived – held as user report, not fact, until he confirms what it is.

Home Needs attention

Moved out 23 August into a friend’s spare room. No lease, and nowhere for the children to sleep – which is upstream of the children dimension.

Wellbeing Stable

Sleeping badly, eating irregularly, working. No safety indicators on any turn. Watched rather than acted on.

Money Unknown

Nothing established – no assets, income, debts or child support discussed. The map says unknown rather than assume a position.

Support Unknown

Nothing established about family, friends, GP or any professional he already trusts.

Two of seven dimensions sit at unknown after five days, and stay there. Manufactured certainty is the failure mode this design exists to prevent.

Don’t Send This Yet

A fictional message, written for this document.

What he typed

“You know exactly what you did. You’ve turned the kids against me and everyone can see it. I’m done being reasonable – my lawyer will be in touch and you’ll be explaining yourself to a judge.”

  • Children in the conflict Characterising the other parent to the other parent, through the children.
  • Legal threat as pressure Reads as intimidation, and it is the sentence that gets quoted back.
  • Nothing actionable Nothing here asks for the thing he actually wants.

What it offered instead

“I’d like to sort out this weekend’s pick-up. Can we confirm Friday at 5pm at the usual place? If that doesn’t work, tell me what does and I’ll make it fit.”

Calm, factual, child-focused, and it asks for one specific thing. The system does not send anything – he does.

05How it actually works

The conversation is not the product. It is how the product collects its inputs.

One turn, end to end

He types something

Persisted under row-level security first. There is no path by which the server could write it to another user’s case.

Lexical safety pre-screen

Runs before any model call at all. If it flags, a dedicated safety assessor runs before the reply streams, and its judgement shapes what he reads.

Context assembled deterministically

Seven layers, each budgeted, capped at 22,000 characters. Not a vector search, not a guess – ordinary code reading his own rows.

The conversation replies

Streamed and human. The only model output he sees directly – and it is not trusted to change anything about his case.

The case assessor runs behind it

A separate function on the same message: memories, chronology, priorities, safety signals. Same model, never the same prompt – a good reply and a reliable extraction want different things.

The application decides

Every structured output is schema-validated; a failure gets one retry, then is discarded rather than applied. What lands in the case record is deterministic code.

Facts are classified, not assumed

Six classes, enforced at the schema and database level rather than in wording. An accusation can never quietly become a fact through repetition – which is what makes the professional handover pack usable by a lawyer.

Fact User report Allegation Assumption Professional finding Unknown
What the classification is not. Steadfast works from what the user tells it. It does not independently know that something happened because a user says it did, and it does not perform evidentiary verification. The six classes keep the record honest; they do not test it.

The context has a hard ceiling

Character budget by context layer Recent conversation 9,000 characters; Australian knowledge 4,000; significant chronology 2,800; relevant memories 2,400; current situation 1,600; priorities and next action 1,600; core profile 600. Total capped at 22,000. Recent conversation Australian knowledge Significant chronology Relevant memories Current situation Priorities, next action Core profile 9,000 4,000 2,800 2,400 1,600 1,600 600 Characters per layer · total capped at 22,000 (about 5,500 tokens)

The prompt cannot grow unbounded however long the case runs. The hundredth turn costs what the tenth did – a cost control, a latency control and a prompt-injection ceiling in one decision.

AI limitations. These controls are designed to reduce certain failure modes. They do not eliminate error. AI-generated information may be wrong, incomplete or out of date, and AI confidence is not professional certainty. Anything material to legal rights, safety, money or health should be checked with a qualified professional. Detail.

06Product principles

Eight rules treated as architectural requirements. Where an implementation choice threatens one, the principle wins.

  1. Children before winning. No adversarial coaching for its own sake.
  2. Safety before strategy. A dedicated layer, not a prompt suggestion.
  3. Responsibility without judgement. He is not automatically right; she is not automatically wrong.
  4. Action before information. One next best action, never a ten-point list.
  5. Personalised before generic. Advice sharpens as the structured case grows.
  6. Professional bridge, not replacement. It makes people better prepared to use professionals.
  7. Facts are sacred. Six classifications, enforced in the schema.
  8. Unknown is a valid answer. No manufactured certainty.

These are also the commercial position. Every one is a decision to be less impressive in a demo in order to be more usable at 11pm on a Tuesday.

07Technology and architecture

Small, modern, low operational burden – and chosen so no single supplier can hold the product hostage.

Layer Choice Why
Client React 19, TypeScript, mobile-first He is on a phone, late at night, often on poor reception.
Edge Cloudflare Workers No servers to patch; deployment is one command.
Data Postgres 17, Sydney, RLS on every table Residency and isolation enforced by the database, not the application.
Model Claude behind a model-agnostic adapter Swapping provider is a config change, not a rewrite.
Transport AI Gateway, payload logging off Cost and latency telemetry kept; prompts never retained.
Speech Whisper in the browser Dictated audio never leaves the device.

Three decisions worth an investor’s attention

No privileged data path
The server reads data with the caller’s own credential, so row-level security applies to server-side code as it does to the browser. There is no shared privileged read path an application bug could reach through. An administrative credential exists for account deletion and is not used for ordinary data access.
The model is behind an interface
Supplier concentration is the standard risk in an AI product. Here it is bounded: two implementations already exist and no orchestration code names a vendor.
Cost per user has a ceiling
The context cap plus a durable hourly quota means the worst case for an account is bounded rather than estimated.

08Privacy, security and residency

An empty Australian suburban street at first light, mist still hanging, one streetlight on.
The morning after the night the safety layer exists for.Concept image

This holds what a man tells nobody else, in the weeks he is least able to protect himself. Privacy is not a compliance exercise here. It is the reason he opens it at all.

Isolation

Row-level security on every table, with write checks so a row can never be reassigned.

Residency

Postgres 17 in Sydney. Australian data stays in Australia.

Anonymous start

He can begin with no email and claim the account later.

Model privacy

The gateway keeps latency, tokens and cost. It never keeps what was said.

Speech

Transcribed on his device. An earlier build streaming audio to a third party was removed.

Telemetry

No content in analytics, logs or tracing. Errors sanitised – a message can quote the user.

User rights

Complete export, irreversible deletion, inspectable and deletable memories.

Abuse controls

Captcha, a burst limiter, and an hourly quota counted from insert-only rows.

Browser

CSP, framing denied, self-hosted fonts – no third party learns which address loaded the site.

Stated, not buried

To produce a reply, what he writes goes to the model provider in the United States. Everything else – the case, the chronology, the memories, the account – stays in Sydney. The privacy promise and the consent screen both say so in his own words, and list his rights under the Australian Privacy Principles including the OAIC.

Architecture, not a guarantee. These are statements about how the system is built. No claim is made that information can never be accessed, or that any system is incapable of failure. Retention settings are configuration and do not govern the model provider’s own handling. Detail.

Verification

Re-run against the live database on 2 September 2026: all seventeen tables carry row-level security keyed on the caller’s identity, and file storage is scoped to his own folder. It was allowed to go stale once, when attachments were added – and the project recorded it as stale rather than keep citing it.

Outstanding: a privacy impact assessment, a reviewed privacy policy, and a breach procedure – to confirm – legal review status and entity.

09Where the line is

The fastest way to destroy this is to let it drift into practising law, medicine or crisis care. The boundary is enforced in the system, not written on a page.

Three layers, in order, ahead of everything else

1

Lexical pre-screen

Runs before any model call at all.

2

Structured safety assessor

Separate from the case assessor. Where the pre-screen flags, it runs before the reply streams and shapes what he reads.

3

Crisis knowledge

Held in an updatable layer, correctable without a deployment.

Verified live: on disclosure of suicidal ideation the assessment returns urgent, coaching stops, emergency and crisis contacts surface – and the system does not claim anyone has been contacted on his behalf.

What it will not help with

Written into the prompt, not left to the model’s judgement.

Breach an order Hide an asset Move a child without agreement Record or track someone Use the children as leverage

A real person, near him

Thirty-seven support services across every state and territory – crisis, mental health, family violence, legal aid, community legal, family relationships, parenting, child support and the court line. Each records how its number was checked.

28 confirmed against the service’s own site or a government directory · 9 pending re-check, recorded rather than guessed at. That gap is blocking, not acceptable.

Steadfast is not a crisis or emergency service. It does not monitor users continuously, know a user’s location unless it is explicitly provided, contact emergency services on anyone’s behalf, or guarantee intervention. The safety layer is a software control, not supervision. Detail.

Standing disclosure carried by the product

In an emergency call 000. Crisis support: Lifeline 13 11 14, MensLine 1300 78 99 78.

10Build status and evidence

All seven build phases are complete. What matters is the distinction between what has been written and what has been exercised against a deployed environment with a real model behind it.

0 Repository and architecture Complete
1 Authentication and secure persistence Complete
2 Persistent AI conversation Complete
3 Separation intelligence Complete
4 Event intelligence and intervention Complete
5 Professional bridge Complete
6 Hardening Complete
– Commercial readiness – pricing, billing, entity, paid users Not started

What live testing found that code review could not

API testing passed cleanly while four defects sat in the deployed product: the browser bundle pointed at the wrong database, the security policy blocked the app’s own start-up script, the AI wrote to the user in the third person in the most prominent sentence on screen, and every reply appeared twice – that one since the first commit.

All four are fixed and regression-tested. They are here because a memorandum that reports only successes says nothing about how a team finds problems.

That is not the same as using the product, and the difference mattered: three defects were invisible to it, because none of them live in the server.

From the project’s own verification record, on API-level testing

Deliberate boundaries in the current build

  • The short horizon shows at most three items per band – a product decision, not a technical cap.
  • Burst limiting is per-instance; the durable control is the database-counted hourly quota.
  • Professional review of the knowledge layer is manual by design at this stage.
  • The brand mark is drafted and in the product; the identity beneath it is not finished.

11MarketHypothesis

The qualitative case is strong. The quantitative case is not yet built, and this section says so rather than filling the gap.

A high-volume, recurring life event with a twelve-month window of maximum need. The user is a separated Australian father, thirty to fifty-five, characteristically unwilling to ask a person for help – the trait that leaves the segment underserved, and the reason a private system reaches people that human-staffed services do not. Adjacent segments are deliberately deferred.

Sizing, to be completed on published Australian data
Measure Value Intended source
Annual separations in Australia to confirm ABS – noting separation materially exceeds divorce, and de facto separations are not in divorce statistics.
Share with dependent children to confirm AIFS and ABS family statistics.
Serviceable – men, first 12 months to confirm Derived from the two rows above.
Reachable at launch to confirm Constrained by the channels at section 13, not by the population.

Method. Bottom-up from published Australian statistics with every step shown, cross-checked against reachable channel volumes. A top-down “global wellbeing app market” figure would be larger, faster to produce, and worth nothing to a reader who intends to check it.

12Business modelHypothesis

No pricing is set and no billing exists. What is settled is the shape of the model and the cost floor beneath it.

Revenue – outstanding

Primary model
to confirm – direct, professional-referred, or both
Price point
to confirm
Free tier
to confirm – a safety decision as much as a pricing one: the user in crisis is frequently the user who cannot pay.
Expected lifetime
Structurally bounded. The acute need is twelve months, and a user who no longer needs it is a success, not churn. Modelling must reflect that.

Costs – partly known

Fixed infrastructure
US$10 per month today. Effectively a rounding error at this stage.
Variable model cost
The dominant unit cost, bounded by the context cap and hourly quota. Measured figure: to confirm – a query against gateway metrics, not an estimate.
Acquisition
to confirm – unknown until the channels are tested.
Human cost
Knowledge, safety and professional review are human by design and do not vanish with scale. to confirm

The one genuinely encouraging structural fact: because the context is capped, gross margin per user does not decay as a case gets more complex.

13Route to marketProposed

A meeting table seen from above: a stack of printed dated pages, an open folder, a pen on a notepad, reading glasses and two coffee cups.
The commercial argument in one frame: a client who arrives with this is cheaper to serve and better served.Concept image

He does not search for help and does not respond to being marketed to as someone who needs it. He is reached where he is already dealing with the separation.

Family law practices
The strongest channel, because the interests align. The handover pack is built for exactly this handoff. First professional stress-test arranged; pipeline beyond it to confirm.
Men’s health and support services
Already trusted by the segment, holding the emotional load, with no tool for the organisational one. to confirm
Mediators and dispute resolution
A prepared party makes mediation shorter and likelier to settle. to confirm
Employers and member organisations
Separation is a leading cause of lost productivity in male-dominated workforces. to confirm
Direct and word of mouth
Present, and not to be relied on early. Men do not recommend this product to each other easily.
No referral arrangement exists today. Any future arrangement is subject to legal, professional and disclosure requirements. Providers are separate third parties; Steadfast would not control their advice, a referral would guarantee nothing, users would remain free to choose their own professional, and providers will not be ranked by what they pay. Detail.

The credibility test. Not user satisfaction – whether an experienced family law practitioner recognises that a client arriving after using this is substantially better organised and less likely to have damaged his own position.

14Competitive position

The honest framing: the underlying model is a commodity anyone can rent. Everything defensible sits in what surrounds it.

General AI assistants

Where they win Free, familiar, extremely capable at a single reply.

Where this differs A general assistant is not designed to carry a case between sessions, to hold a classification of fact against allegation, or to treat a safety signal as a distinct obligation. The structured case is the difference, and it is not a prompt.

Legal information sites

Where they win Authoritative, free, comprehensive.

Where this wins Generic by nature. No memory, no priority, no next move.

Co-parenting apps

Where they win Established, court-recognised communication and scheduling records.

Where this wins They record what happened between two parties. They do not help one person think, decide or prepare – and they arrive after arrangements exist, which is the wrong end of the first year.

Wellbeing and therapy apps

Where they win Strong brands, real clinical grounding.

Where this wins They treat the feeling. They do not organise the case or stop the message.

Legal-tech document tools

Where they win Efficient at producing forms and agreements.

Where this wins They assume a user who already knows what he needs. This user does not yet know what he does not know.

Comparative statements are founder assessment of product design, made from public product behaviour rather than testing, and are not claims about any named competitor’s capabilities.

What is actually defensible

The accumulated case

Six months of classified, dated, corrected intelligence does not port. Switching cost is real without any lock-in mechanic.

The classification discipline

Six classes at the schema level must be designed in, not prompted on.

The professional relationship

Practitioner trust is earned slowly and is not purchasable. It is also the channel.

The Australian specificity

A reviewed knowledge layer that is actually populated, service by service, state by state – exactly what a fast follower skips.

The restraint

A competitor who makes it say more and take a side builds something a family lawyer tells clients to stop using.

Not defensible

The model, the stack, the interface. Any of it can be rebuilt. Assume a fast follower and compete on the five above.

15Team and governance

A small delivery team that has shipped the MVP, and a governance layer that does not exist yet. The two should not be read as the same thing.

People and roles as at 4 September 2026. Placeholder pending confirmation of titles, engagement basis and time commitment.
Clent Jewell Founder and CEO, Steadfast. Marketing Director, Jewell. Product direction, the separation journey design and the product principles. to confirm – background, track record, time commitment
Ronnie Project management, Jewell. Production and quality assurance for Steadfast, including the pressure-test scenarios.
Rao Web development and deployment, Jewell. Build, release and environment.
Liz Administration and design, Jewell.

Governance, none of which is in place

Clinical and safety review to confirm – who reviews the safety layer, and how often. No clinician has reviewed it.
Family law advice First practitioner stress-test arranged. No formal advisory arrangement. to confirm
Legal and compliance to confirm – Australian counsel for the review gate at section 20 of the notice
Entity and structure to confirm – entity, jurisdiction, cap table
Intellectual property to confirm – ownership of code, brand and the name
Board or advisory None. to confirm – whether one is formed before raising
Nobody named above is a qualified lawyer, and none is represented as one. Steadfast and Jewell are not law firms and do not provide legal advice. Detail.

The delivery team is named. The governance is not. Every row in the second table is unresolved, and the safety and legal rows are relied on elsewhere in this document as risk management. They are commitments to make, not controls in place.

16Risks and mitigations

Risk Assessment and mitigation
A user is harmed and the product is implicated The gravest risk, and why safety is a dedicated layer ahead of every model call. Verified live. Residual exposure needs insurance and counsel – to confirm.
Perceived as giving legal advice Mitigated in the prompts, the schema and the interface: no legal conclusions, questions framed as questions. Needs standing legal review – to confirm.
A privacy breach Structurally reduced: no privileged path, isolation in the database, no payload retention, no content in logs. Re-verified 2 September across all seventeen tables. Residual exposure is the provider’s handling of what is sent, which is disclosed rather than managed away.
Model supplier concentration Bounded by the adapter. Provider and model are configuration; two implementations exist.
Behaviour drifts on model upgrade Prompts are version-controlled and stamped onto every stored reply; thirty pressure scenarios cover safety, injection and boundary cases.
Prompt injection through user content Case context and user content are declared data, not instructions, in every prompt; structured output is schema-validated; injection is in the test suite.
The segment will not pay Unproven and material. No pricing tested. The primary commercial unknown; the professional channel exists partly to de-risk it.
Perceived as taking sides A product for separated men that read as adversarial would be correctly criticised. Principles one and three exist for this and are enforced in the prompts.
Key person dependency Real at this size. to confirm – mitigation
A well-resourced fast follower Assumed. Competing on the five defensible points at section 14 rather than on features.

17The raise

Terms are not settled. This is the shape the section will take.

Amount sought to confirm
Instrument to confirm – equity, note or SAFE
Valuation or cap to confirm
Minimum ticket to confirm
Committed to date to confirm
Target close to confirm
Runway funded to confirm – months, and to which milestone

Use of funds

What the project actually needs next, rather than a conventional split. Percentages to confirm.

  1. Clinical and legal validation. Safety review, family law advisory, privacy impact assessment, insurance. The gate on launch, not a compliance afterthought.
  2. Closing the commercial unknowns. Pricing research, a paid pilot through the professional channel, unit economics measured from live data.
  3. Launch-readiness engineering. Billing, a distributed rate limiter, the operational tooling a paid product needs.
  4. Channel development. Practitioner partnerships – slow, relationship-led, and the main determinant of reachable market.
  5. Brand. The mark is drafted and in the product; the identity beneath it is not finished.

18Roadmap

A man and a young child walk away along a dirt path through coastal scrub on an Australian headland at late afternoon, seen from behind.
Twelve months on. Success is a user who no longer needs the product.Concept image

Sequenced by what has to be true before the next thing is safe to do, not by calendar. Dates to confirm.

1

Validate

Professional stress-test. Commission the safety review. Close the nine unconfirmed support numbers.

2

Prove it is wanted

A closed pilot through the professional channel. Measure the ten-minute test, the return rate, and whether practitioners see the difference.

3

Prove it can be sold

Pricing tested, billing built, unit economics measured from live data. Brand and name resolved.

4

Widen

Separated mothers, the second year, extended family, and the practitioner-facing product on the same case structure.

Every stage before “prove it can be sold” exists to make sure the thing being sold does not hurt anybody, because a single serious failure in this category ends the product regardless of its economics. The sequence is proposed, not committed, and completing the software is not completing legal or compliance review.

19Outstanding inputs

Every unsettled item in one place – the distance between this draft and a document that can be sent.

6 Blocking – do not issue until closed
4 Strengthening – issue without, but weaker
39 Individual figures marked unconfirmed
Blocking

02 · 17 – The raise

Amount, instrument, valuation or cap, minimum ticket, committed to date, target close, runway, use-of-funds split.

Blocking

15 – Governance

Entity and cap table, IP ownership, clinical and safety reviewer, family-law adviser, Australian counsel, board or advisory. The delivery team is named; none of this is in place.

Blocking

11 – Market

Bottom-up sizing on ABS and AIFS data, with each derivation step shown.

Blocking

12 – Business model

Pricing, free-tier boundary, professional channel shape, measured cost per active user, human review budget.

Blocking

08 · 16 – Legal and privacy

Privacy impact assessment, reviewed privacy policy, breach procedure, insurance position.

Blocking

09 – Support directory

Nine of thirty-seven entries pending re-check. A wrong number handed to a distressed person is the harm this product exists to avoid.

Strengthening

Front matter

Issuing entity name for the confidentiality notice; contact details for enquiries.

Strengthening

13 – Route to market

Practitioner pipeline beyond the first stress-test; partnership approach for each remaining channel.

Strengthening

16 – Risk

Key person mitigation.

Strengthening

18 – Roadmap

Dates against each stage.

20Appendix

A · Verification record15 checks

Exercised against the deployed system with a genuine session, not inferred from source.

Check Result
Unauthenticated API access Rejected on every protected route.
Live model reply, deployed Streamed through the gateway.
Clarifying questions Two precise questions; belief separated from fact.
Separation Map All seven dimensions; unknowns retained.
Next Best Action One action, with the reason it matters.
Memories Three captured, typed, pending review.
Chronology Three entries, all dated, worded as reports.
Date resolution Relative dates resolved against the real calendar.
Don’t Send This Yet Risks classified with excerpts; rewrite calm and child-focused.
Professional pack Eleven sections; classifications apart; no legal conclusions.
Safety – suicidal ideation Urgent; coaching stopped; 000, Lifeline and MensLine surfaced; no false claim of contact.
Isolation, re-verified 2 Sept 2026 All seventeen tables, per-command policies, file storage scoped to the caller’s folder.
Support directory 37 entries, 9 jurisdictions; 28 confirmed against source, 9 pending.
Data export Fourteen sections, complete and readable.
Deployed build, phone-sized browser Seventy checks across public pages, the setup gate, chat error paths, support in two states, and the disclosures.
B · Glossary5 terms
Separation Map
The live picture across seven dimensions, four priority levels, unknown by default.
Next Best Action
The single action the system believes matters most, with its reasoning. Superseded, never overwritten.
Case assessor
The structured function behind each turn that extracts memories, chronology, priorities and safety signals.
Row Level Security
A database feature restricting which rows a credential can read or write, enforced by the database itself.
Professional pack
A printable preparation document keeping facts, reports, assumptions and unknowns visibly apart.
C · Sources and provenanceRead this before circulating

Every product, architecture, security and verification claim comes from the Steadfast codebase, its committed documentation, and dated live runs recorded there. Nothing in sections 03 to 10 is aspirational.

The photography is generated concept imagery, labelled as such on every plate. No frame is a photograph of a real user, client or team member, and none should be reproduced as though it were. The Separation Map and the message in section 04 are fictional.

D · Important NoticeRead in full before circulating

This memorandum is private and confidential and has been prepared for discussion and information purposes only. It contains general information, founder opinions, product concepts and commercial hypotheses and does not constitute legal, financial, investment or other professional advice. Steadfast and Jewell are not law firms and do not provide legal advice. Nothing here constitutes an offer, invitation or recommendation to acquire any security or financial product, nor is it a prospectus or other disclosure document. Product capabilities, commercial models, market opportunities and forward-looking statements remain subject to validation and may change. Recipients should make their own enquiries and obtain independent professional advice before acting on this information.

The full notice runs to twenty sections – the professional boundary, legal information, AI limitations, user-supplied information, parenting, property, safety, financial matters, referrals, the standing of these documents, confidentiality, founder opinions, forward-looking statements, outcome guarantees, privacy, Australian Consumer Law, how the three disclosure layers are applied, the short form and consumer notices, and the final legal review gate. It is at the Important Notice and forms part of this document.

It has not been reviewed by Australian legal counsel. Final wording of that notice, the Terms of Use, the Privacy Policy, referral arrangements and all consumer representations should be reviewed by appropriately qualified Australian advisers before public launch or external distribution.

Enquiries. to confirm – contact name, email and entity. Confidential; not to be reproduced or circulated without written consent.